Wilkie Collins: The Woman in White
If you had asked me a few weeks ago what I knew about Wilkie Collins, the honest answer would have been ‘nothing.’ If you had put the thumbscrews on and said TELL ME EVERYTHING YOU KNOW in a threatening voice, then I would have yelped ‘erm, wasn’t he friends with Dickens? And wasn’t he kind of a pervert? That’s all I know! I’m SORRY! Don’t HURT me anymore!’
But a few weeks ago I was living in an empty, pre-Wilkie world. And now I have seen the light. The light shining off the Woman in White’s shiny white dress. And the light is awesome.
|
||
The Woman in White, for those people like me who have lived their lives under a rock, is the first ‘sensation’ novel and one of the first mystery/detective novels too. It was written as a serial, and so each chapter ends on a BIG CLIFF HANGER. Like a classy soap opera. Imagine inventing an entire genre by yourself. The public went mental over it – apparently when published in book form, it became the best selling book of the 19th century – and its easy to see why.
The hero, Walter Hartright (CLUE to him being a hero in the name, see) is a drawing teacher who keeps having these mysterious encounters with an ethereal woman dressed in white. He goes to teach Laura Fairlie, inevitably falls in love with her, and finds himself entangled in a family drama which keeps getting deeper and deeper, and all somehow connected to the Woman.
In the best tradition of heroines, Laura is pathetic, wet and annoying. But the cast of supporting characters more than makes up for this. Whiny Mr Fairlie is the Victorian invalid taken to extremes. Marion, Laura’s sister, is passionate, articulate and decisive. And Count Fosco is the most unconventional villain I’ve ever come across: with a weakness for cream and white mice, hypnotic powers, hideous and menacing but charming and irresistable to women.
You lose something by scoffing the whole thing in one go, I think, but that’s my own fault for becoming addicted to it.
Spoilers in the next paragraph
I have to say that when the secret is revealed, I was a little bit underwhelmed, but that’s my modern immorality getting in the way. I’m sure the Victorians found it very shocking. I also felt like the ending, involving Professor Pesca, was a bit too far-fetched. It was almost like Wilkie got bored, and thought ‘how can I get this over and done with in a couple more instalments?’ Otherwise ‘The Woman in White’ is fabulous. I did get frustrated in places and thought TELL ME THE ANSWERS but that’s because my attention span is very limited.
OK, uncover your eyes now
The Husband has a little thing for Wilkie, having studied him in college, and so kept telling me sort-of interesting facts while I was trying to read. Apparently Thomas Hardy couldn’t get his mournful tales of woe published because everyone wanted to read sensation novels, so Hardy had to churn one out to get his foot in the door. The Husband would also proclaim ‘Count Fosco’ in his best fake-scary-dramatic voice every now and again. Like how the hyenas say ‘Mufasa’ in the Lion King. Not distracting at all.
The Oxford World Classics edition I was reading had a great introduction, with many more useful facts. I could do a whole pub quiz on the Woman in White now. The impression I had of Wilkie being a bit pervy was slightly exaggerated, though his private live was a little on the murky side and he had not one, but two, mistresses and kept them in separate houses. The introduction tells me that this is reflected in the ending of the Woman in White. Oh delicious scandal.
Get this now. It’s a thriller, thriller night, as Michael Jackson said.
Posted on August 7, 2010, in Uncategorized and tagged 19th century literature, book reviews, books, classics, reading, sensation novels, the woman in white, thrillers, wilkie collins. Bookmark the permalink. 11 Comments.


Vincent Price’s contribution to Thriller would fit in nicely here as well. “No mere mortal can resist…” Great review!
Ooh, I just finished reading this recently. Loved your description of Laura – I think I called her a soggy lettuce? I agree with feeling a little ‘blah’ about the ending, but it was definitely an era thing. Your other point about not scoffing the whole lot down in one go is so true, I remember having to stop at parts because I was so angry at the villains, but kept going because I was waiting for the big reveal.
Awesome review!
Sounds like a great novel. It’s going on my To Be Read list.
I keep meaning to read this. Love your review. I must move this book up the TBR pile.
YES!!!! I love seeing people discover this book! It was the first Collins I read too, about a year ago.
@Whitney: hahahahaha
@thefriande: lettuce Laura is spot on!
@Loni and @chrisbookarama – yeay, definitely
@Amanda – am looking forward to reading others
I’ve been toying with reading the book ever since I came across it in Drood (Dan Simmons). Like your review, maybe I’ll pick up a copy.
“In the best tradition of heroines, Laura is pathetic, wet and annoying. ”
LOL at that sentence….I got introduced to Collins, when I was in school and I remember loving them. I can’t remember too much now, so it looks like it’s reread time for me.
If you liked this one, you should also consider “The Moonstone”, which is another great Collins thriller
Pingback: forgotten treasure « amused, bemused and confused
Pingback: Wilkie Collins – The Moonstone « amused, bemused and confused
Pingback: In Which It Is My Blogoversary « amused, bemused and confused